25-10-2019 |
Tathagata Basak : Iowa State University Mathematics Colloquium |
A couple of curious reflection groups
Reflection groups occur all over representation theory and
geometry. We want to begin with a quick survey of finite reflection
groups, talk a little about classifying them and their connections to some
other areas of mathematics.
Then we want to focus on two examples of hyperbolic reflection groups; one
real and one complex. Both examples involve the Leech lattice; the lattice
that produces the best packing of spheres in 24 dimensional Euclidean
space. Both examples are (probably) related to the largest sporadic finite
simple group known as the monster. The connection in the complex case is
still a conjecture.
We will not assume any previous familiarity with hyperbolic reflection
groups or the Leech lattice or the Monster.
|
|
23-10-2019 |
Vishal Vasan: ICTS Bengaluru.: Mathematics Colloquium |
Two unexpected applications of boundary value problems.
Partial differential equations (PDE) and their boundary value
problems (BVP) arise naturally in a number of applications. Typically the
system of interest is modelled by a PDE/BVP. In this talk, I will present
two unexpected applications of BVPs where the original system does not
immediately indicate their importance. The first application comes from
the study of a particle moving in a fluid whose motion is modelled by a
finite dimensional system. The analysis will imply a natural
interpretation to the half derivative in terms of boundary-value problems.
The second application comes from the classical study of dispersive shock
waves (DSWs). DSWs are specific solutions to nonlinear dispersive
equations. However, I will present a BVP for a linear equation which
reproduces a number of DSW features. This raises an important question on
how to match experimental DSWs with particular nonlinear models:
qualitative comparisons do not suffice.
|
|
21-10-2019 |
Projesh Nath Choudhury: IISc Bengaluru |
Distance matrices of trees: invariants, old and new.
In 1971, Graham and Pollak showed that if $D_T$ is the distance
matrix of a tree $T$ on $n$ nodes, then $\det(D_T)$ depends only on $n$,
not $T$. This independence from the tree structure has been verified for
many different variants of weighted bi-directed trees. In my talk:
1. I will present a general setting which strictly subsumes every known
variant, and where we show that $\det(D_T)$ - as well as another graph
invariant, the cofactor-sum - depends only on the edge-data, not the
tree-structure.
2. More generally - even in the original unweighted setting - we
strengthen the state-of-the-art, by computing the minors of $D_T$ where
one removes rows and columns indexed by equal-sized sets of pendant nodes.
(In fact, we go beyond pendant nodes.)
3. We explain why our result is the "most general possible", in that
allowing greater freedom in the parameters leads to dependence on the
tree-structure.
4. Our results hold over an arbitrary unital commutative ring. This uses
Zariski density, which seems to be new in the field, yet is richly
rewarding.
We then discuss related results for arbitrary strongly connected graphs,
including a third, novel invariant. If time permits, a formula for
$D_T^{-1}$ will be presented for trees $T$, whose special case answers an
open problem of Bapat-Lal-Pati (Linear Alg. Appl. 2006), and which extends
to our general setting a result of Graham-Lovasz (Advances in Math. 1978).
(Joint with Apoorva Khare)
|
|
24-10-2019 |
Tony J. Puthenpurakal |
Triangulated categories-I,II,III.
We define and give elementary properties of triangulated
categories. We also give an application of triangulated categories to
linkage theory in commutative algebra.
|
|
21-10-2019 |
Soumi Tikader :ISI Kolkata |
Orbit spaces of unimodular rows over smooth real affine algebras.
In this talk we will discuss about the group structure on orbit
spaces of unimodular rows over smooth real affine algebras. With a few
definition and some results to start, we will prove a structure theorem of
elementary orbit spaces of unimodular rows over aforementioned ring with
the help of similar kind results on Euler class group. As a consequences,
we will prove that :
Let $X=Spec(R)$ be a smooth real affine variety of even dimension $d > 1$,
whose real points $X(R)$ constitute an orientable manifold. Then the set
of isomorphism classes of (oriented) stably free $R$ of rank $d > 1$ is a
free abelian group of rank equal to the number of compact connected
components of $X(R)$.
In contrast, if $d > 2$ is odd, then the set of isomorphism classes of
stably free $R$-modules of rank $d$ is a $Z/2Z$-vector space (possibly
trivial). We will end this talk by giving a structure theorem of Mennicke
symbols.
|
|
18-10-2019 |
Mrinal Kumar : Computer Science Department, IIT Bombay |
Introduction to the Polynomial Method in Combinatorics II (Lower
bounds on Kakeya sets over finite fields).
For a finite field F, a Kakeya set is a subset of F^n that
contains a line in every direction. We will discuss a result of Dvir
showing a lower bound of C_n*q^n on the size of any Kakeya set over F^n,
where C_n only depends on n and F is a finite field of size q.
|
|
16-10-2019 |
Probal Chaudhuri : ISI Kolkata : Mathematics Colloquium |
Minimization by Monte-Carlo.
|
|
15-10-2019 |
Probal Chaudhuri : ISI Kolkata |
Learning Mahalanobis distance from C R Rao.
|
|
14-10-2019 |
Nitin Nitsure : TIFR Mumbai |
Vector bundles, stability and Harder-Narasimhan filtration.
Vector bundles in geometry generalize projective modules in
algebra. They are the simplest sort of coherent sheaves. We will introduce
the all important notion of stability of vector bundles. The stable
bundles have nice properties, and luckily, most bundles are stable. But
even those bundles that are not stable can be analysed in terms of stable
bundles. This is done by the notion of the Harder-Narasimhan filtration of
a bundle. We will give a sketch of the theory and illustrate it with
examples.
|
|
09-10-2019 |
Sudeep Stephen: National University of Singapore. |
Zero Forcing in Graphs.
Fo a two-colouring of the vertex set of a simple graph G = (V,E), consider the following colour-change rule: a red vertex is converted to blue if it is the only red neighbour of some blue vertex. A vertex set S ⊆ V is called zero-forcing if, starting with the vertices in S blue and the vertices in the complement V \ S red, all the vertices can be converted to blue by repeatedly applying the colour-change rule. The minimum cardinality of a zero-forcing set for the graph G is called the zero-forcing number of G, denoted by Z(G). This concept was introduced by the AIM Minimum Rank –Special Graphs Work Group in [1] as a tool to bound the minimum rank of matrices associated with the graph G. In this talk, I shall give an overview of the zero forcing problem along with some of the results that we have obtained during my Ph.D candidature. To conclude, I shall state few open problems that I intend to tackle along with my mentors. References [1] AIM Minimum Rank –Special Graphs Work Group. Zero forcing sets and the minimum rank of graphs. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(7):16281648, 2008.
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next Last |